Social Justice Coalition
Today I sat in on a Social Justice Coalition meeting with Vice President/Dean of Students Kim Goff-Crews, Vice President of Administration/Chief Financial Office Nim Chinniah, University Secretary David Fithian, and Assistant Vice President Bill Michel.
This was about the latest response from the Administration to the Social Justice Coalition (read here) on last year’s proposals (read here). College Council voted last year to support these proposals, although we haven’t talked to Social Justice since then.
The meeting was relatively productive, I would say. Topics included:
- Sustainability in the University, more specifically the role of the part-time Sustainability Coordinator and the new Assistant VP for Facilities, Steven M. Wiesenthal.
- Diversity, specifically the possibility of hiring a part-time person dedicated to LGBTQ support. We also talked about minority hiring and the work being done by Deputy Provost Ken Warren, with whom the Slate met with last quarter.
- The role of a Socially Responsible Investing group to oversee the University’s investment decisions.
- And Student Representation on the Board of Trustees.
On the first two agenda items there seemed to be a lot of agreement between everyone in the room. We need to do more on both Diversity and Sustainability and the Administrators seem to have plans to make that happen.
On the subject of Socially Responsible Investing there was very little progress. David reported the Board of Trustees felt the University needed to honor its commitment to the Kalven Report (PDF). For change to happen, the Board would need to see the Faculty reexamine Kalven and either reaffirm the 1967 Document or create something new. Until that can occur, it’s unlikely they would be ok with this type of Committee.
The other subject which was touched upon is the student representation to the Board of Trustees. Like we have reported, this is kind of a non starter with the Board given the Faculty, Alumni, or Staff don’t have a vote. But there is hope! The two Liaisons are working to attend other Board committee meetings than just the Student Life committee, something which will hopefully happen at their Spring Meeting.
Another note which the meeting really highlighted, for me, is where SG isn’t following through with its communications efforts. The Social Justice Students didn’t really see us as transparent or open, especially regarding our interactions with the Board. While I’ve been really happy with how far we’ve come, it definitely reminded me how far we need to go, specifically in supporting the Liaisons to make sure our interactions with Trustees are as open as possible.
Interested in Social Justice or Student Government? Utilize le comments.
Written by Scott

