The Student Goverment Blog « « Election Analysis Part 2:... Maroon Debate Coverage » »


April 24, 2008

Election Analysis Part 1: Maroon Endorsement

I’m trying to not write my political science senior thesis, which is due tomorrow. So instead I’ll digest some tidbit of tonight’s election results. I want to start with the Maroon Endorsement, which was different this year because they endorsed Liaison and College Council candidates.

Lets see if people listened to them. This year the Maroon endorsed:

So how’d they do? Well, using the results we see that they were 6 for 14.

This isn’t great and would really make me question whether the Maroon’s endorsement has much of an effect at all, especially given the wide margins which their endorsed candidates were beaten by the actual winners in the Executive Slate and Liaison Categories (One Campus beat Connect Four by 600 votes and Aliza beat Louis by a little less than 500 votes).

But history tells a different story. In 2007, 2006, 2005, and 2004 the Maroon was endorsed the winning Slate three out of four years. The recent changes puts them at 3 for 5 for Executive Slate, which isn’t bad.

In terms of CC and Liaison, they didn’t do as hot. With CC they did best with the class of 2010 then 2009 then 2011. Maybe first years aren’t reading the Maroon as they only elected one of the endorsed candidates. We’ll have to see whether these endorsements take on more importance over time.

Next Section: Turnout!

Written by Scott

2 Comments »

  1. I read the Maroon’s coverage on the SG debate, and the Maroon endorsements. In truth, the Maroon endorsements were not compelling enough for me to change my mind. Sometimes, their coverage was a bit offending. I agree with Kevin Brown; they went too far on their attacks against Nick Zhao. Even though I disagreed with Nick, the editorial nonetheless left a bad taste in my mouth.

    Furthermore, they did not give me enough information to vote for whoever they endorsed. For example, their justifications for endorsing Potok were too general. Besides saying that he does not have any “negatives” associated with him, the Maroon only stated that he had ‘good ideas’ and understood the role of the Liaison.

    Ultimately, I based my votes on the Candidate’s statement, and judged the debate for myself.

    Comment by Lisa — April 25, 2008 @ 2:18 pm

  2. The Maroon’s looking for people to talk to them about the election:

    http://maroon.uchicago.edu/online_edition/article/10268

    Share your thoughts.

    Comment by Scott — April 27, 2008 @ 4:56 pm

RSS feed for comments on this post. TrackBack URL

Leave a comment



Powered by WordPress - RSS for Posts - RSS for Comments